75 research outputs found

    Airflow in a Multiscale Subject-Specific Breathing Human Lung Model

    Full text link
    The airflow in a subject-specific breathing human lung is simulated with a multiscale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) lung model. The three-dimensional (3D) airway geometry beginning from the mouth to about 7 generations of airways is reconstructed from the multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) image at the total lung capacity (TLC). Along with the segmented lobe surfaces, we can build an anatomically-consistent one-dimensional (1D) airway tree spanning over more than 20 generations down to the terminal bronchioles, which is specific to the CT resolved airways and lobes (J Biomech 43(11): 2159-2163, 2010). We then register two lung images at TLC and the functional residual capacity (FRC) to specify subject-specific CFD flow boundary conditions and deform the airway surface mesh for a breathing lung simulation (J Comput Phys 244:168-192, 2013). The 1D airway tree bridges the 3D CT-resolved airways and the registration-derived regional ventilation in the lung parenchyma, thus a multiscale model. Large eddy simulation (LES) is applied to simulate airflow in a breathing lung (Phys Fluids 21:101901, 2009). In this fluid dynamics video, we present the distributions of velocity, pressure, vortical structure, and wall shear stress in a breathing lung model of a normal human subject with a tidal volume of 500 ml and a period of 4.8 s. On exhalation, air streams from child branches merge in the parent branch, inducing oscillatory jets and elongated vortical tubes. On inhalation, the glottal constriction induces turbulent laryngeal jet. The sites where high wall shear stress tends to occur on the airway surface are identified for future investigation of mechanotransduction.Comment: This submission is part of the APS DFD Gallery of Fluid Motio

    A Multi-Scale Approach to Airway Hyperresponsiveness: From Molecule to Organ

    Get PDF
    Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), a characteristic of asthma that involves an excessive reduction in airway caliber, is a complex mechanism reflecting multiple processes that manifest over a large range of length and time scales. At one extreme, molecular interactions determine the force generated by airway smooth muscle (ASM). At the other, the spatially distributed constriction of the branching airways leads to breathing difficulties. Similarly, asthma therapies act at the molecular scale while clinical outcomes are determined by lung function. These extremes are linked by events operating over intermediate scales of length and time. Thus, AHR is an emergent phenomenon that limits our understanding of asthma and confounds the interpretation of studies that address physiological mechanisms over a limited range of scales. A solution is a modular computational model that integrates experimental and mathematical data from multiple scales. This includes, at the molecular scale, kinetics, and force production of actin-myosin contractile proteins during cross-bridge and latch-state cycling; at the cellular scale, Ca2+ signaling mechanisms that regulate ASM force production; at the tissue scale, forces acting between contracting ASM and opposing viscoelastic tissue that determine airway narrowing; at the organ scale, the topographic distribution of ASM contraction dynamics that determine mechanical impedance of the lung. At each scale, models are constructed with iterations between theory and experimentation to identify the parameters that link adjacent scales. This modular model establishes algorithms for modeling over a wide range of scales and provides a framework for the inclusion of other responses such as inflammation or therapeutic regimes. The goal is to develop this lung model so that it can make predictions about bronchoconstriction and identify the pathophysiologic mechanisms having the greatest impact on AHR and its therapy

    The importance of synergy between deep inspirations and fluidization in reversing airway closure.

    Get PDF
    Deep inspirations (DIs) and airway smooth muscle fluidization are two widely studied phenomena in asthma research, particularly for their ability (or inability) to counteract severe airway constriction. For example, DIs have been shown effectively to reverse airway constriction in normal subjects, but this is impaired in asthmatics. Fluidization is a connected phenomenon, wherein the ability of airway smooth muscle (ASM, which surrounds and constricts the airways) to exert force is decreased by applied strain. A maneuver which sufficiently strains the ASM, then, such as a DI, is thought to reduce the force generating capacity of the muscle via fluidization and hence reverse or prevent airway constriction. Understanding these two phenomena is considered key to understanding the pathophysiology of asthma and airway hyper-responsiveness, and while both have been extensively studied, the mechanism by which DIs fail in asthmatics remains elusive. Here we show for the first time the synergistic interaction between DIs and fluidization which allows the combination to provide near complete reversal of airway closure where neither is effective alone. This relies not just on the traditional model of airway bistability between open and closed states, but also the critical addition of previously-unknown oscillatory and chaotic dynamics. It also allows us to explore the types of subtle change which can cause this interaction to fail, and thus could provide the missing link to explain DI failure in asthmatics

    Computational models of the pulmonary circulation: Insights and the move towards clinically directed studies

    No full text
    Biophysically-based computational models provide a tool for integrating and explaining experimental data, observations, and hypotheses. Computational models of the pulmonary circulation have evolved from minimal and efficient constructs that have been used to study individual mechanisms that contribute to lung perfusion, to sophisticated multi-scale and -physics structure-based models that predict integrated structure-function relationships within a heterogeneous organ. This review considers the utility of computational models in providing new insights into the function of the pulmonary circulation, and their application in clinically motivated studies. We review mathematical and computational models of the pulmonary circulation based on their application; we begin with models that seek to answer questions in basic science and physiology and progress to models that aim to have clinical application. In looking forward, we discuss the relative merits and clinical relevance of computational models: what important features are still lacking; and how these models may ultimately be applied to further increasing our understanding of the mechanisms occurring in disease of the pulmonary circulation

    Data from: Airflow in the human nasal passage and sinuses of chronic rhinosinusitis subjects

    No full text
    Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a persistent inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses that is characterized by clinical symptoms that include a blocked nasal airway, mucus discharge, facial pain, headaches and anosmia [1, 2]. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is performed on patients who fail to improve following medical therapies such as antibiotics and corticosteroids (both systemic and topical nasal sprays). In sinus surgery, the goals are to open the obstructed sinus openings (ostia), to improve sinus ventilation and to restore mucociliary clearance. After initial surgery, a number of patients may continue to have ongoing symptoms and recalcitrant disease for which a more extensive operation such as the Modified Endoscopic Lothrop procedure (MELP) is performed [3–5]. The MELP procedure differs from standard frontal sinus dissection because both the frontal beak that narrows the frontal ostia, and the adjacent upper part of the nasal septum and frontal intersinus septum are removed, creating a single large common drainage pathway for both frontal sinuses. Current understanding of the relationship between nasal geometry (pre- and post-operative) and sinus ventilation is poor; and despite surgical intervention, efficient topical distribution of therapeutic drugs remains a significant challenge. Simulating nasal airflow in this complex patient group will improve our understanding of how surgical strategies affect post-surgical sinus ventilation, as well as providing new understanding for how drug delivery treatments and devices [6–10] can be designed to target delivery to the sinuses. Nasal passage is connected to sinus air pockets through an opening called ostia. Airflow in the human nasal cavity has been extensively studied using fluid dynamic simulations. We refer the reader to [11] and references there on. A number of studies have simulated airflow in both nasal passage and the sinuses [10, 12–24]. Xiong et al [12] simulated nasal airflow at 21 L/min in a normal healthy subject and found very little flow between the nasal passage and the sinuses. At the frontal sinus ostium they observed a limited flow rate of 0.014mL/s during inspiration and 0.018 mL/s during expiration. Zhu et al. [20] evaluated post-surgical airways after uncinectomy and bilateral inferior turbinate reduction and noticed that the surgery that aimed to affect flow partitioning also increased sinus ventilation in only one respiratory phase. The effects of surgery on altering nasal airflow is a complex realm and are not completely understood. Also, these studies do not sufficiently describe airflow in the sinus. This study describes airflow in the nasal passage and sinuses using fluid dynamic simulations. Specifically, airflow in pre-operative and post-operative CRS subject is investigated. FESS in CRS patients is known to increase nasal airway patency, however although this leads to reduced nasal resistance, the role of surgery in altering exchange of air between the sinus and nasal passages is not clear. Transient airflow is simulated in a healthy normal subject, a pre-operative subject with CRS, the same subject post-operatively after a standard FESS procedure, and a post-operative subject after a Lothrop procedure. Particular focus is given to describing airflow at the openings to the frontal and maxillary sinuses
    corecore